<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 20 of the Most Iconic Logos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ocularharmony.com/20-most-iconic-influential-logos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ocularharmony.com/20-most-iconic-influential-logos/</link>
	<description>Web Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 05:17:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Help us choose our NEW logo &#8211; mobback Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ocularharmony.com/20-most-iconic-influential-logos/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Help us choose our NEW logo &#8211; mobback Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocularharmony.com/?p=910#comment-144</guid>
		<description>[...] That’s probably because I’m a consumer of those brands but there are certainly many other iconic logos. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That’s probably because I’m a consumer of those brands but there are certainly many other iconic logos. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixi</title>
		<link>http://www.ocularharmony.com/20-most-iconic-influential-logos/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>pixi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocularharmony.com/?p=910#comment-143</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Google&#039;s logo is so interesting...They have become a monster tech company thats make it&#039;s logo popular or well known.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Google&#8217;s logo is so interesting&#8230;They have become a monster tech company thats make it&#8217;s logo popular or well known.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manik</title>
		<link>http://www.ocularharmony.com/20-most-iconic-influential-logos/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Manik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocularharmony.com/?p=910#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Nice collection of iconic logos. Its hard to find so many of the best logos together. You have done great job.
Thanks for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice collection of iconic logos. Its hard to find so many of the best logos together. You have done great job.<br />
Thanks for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logo desgin</title>
		<link>http://www.ocularharmony.com/20-most-iconic-influential-logos/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>logo desgin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 07:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocularharmony.com/?p=910#comment-141</guid>
		<description>great design i like it and the information that you are sharing was awesome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great design i like it and the information that you are sharing was awesome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Burd</title>
		<link>http://www.ocularharmony.com/20-most-iconic-influential-logos/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Burd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocularharmony.com/?p=910#comment-140</guid>
		<description>As for the others, the best one is Apple&#039;s, but the most influential is IBM&#039;s. Block caps picked out in horizontal blue stripes: A thousand high-tech firms must have used that logo template.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the others, the best one is Apple&#8217;s, but the most influential is IBM&#8217;s. Block caps picked out in horizontal blue stripes: A thousand high-tech firms must have used that logo template.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Burd</title>
		<link>http://www.ocularharmony.com/20-most-iconic-influential-logos/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Burd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocularharmony.com/?p=910#comment-139</guid>
		<description>The Windows logo is, and has always been, horrible. Remember the mid-90s versions where it used to wave like a little flag? It&#039;s recognizable only because it belongs to an extremely successful company. 

The same could be said for the Google logo, though it&#039;s mediocre rather than awful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Windows logo is, and has always been, horrible. Remember the mid-90s versions where it used to wave like a little flag? It&#8217;s recognizable only because it belongs to an extremely successful company. </p>
<p>The same could be said for the Google logo, though it&#8217;s mediocre rather than awful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lalugee</title>
		<link>http://www.ocularharmony.com/20-most-iconic-influential-logos/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>lalugee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 07:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocularharmony.com/?p=910#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Its extremely encouraging to see someone do so well..!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its extremely encouraging to see someone do so well..!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lambert</title>
		<link>http://www.ocularharmony.com/20-most-iconic-influential-logos/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lambert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocularharmony.com/?p=910#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Never liked Google&#039;s logo personally. I&#039;d say it&#039;s instantly recognizable more because of Google&#039;s position in the market than anything else. Criminal that British Rail isn&#039;t in there – one of the greatest logos EVER in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never liked Google&#8217;s logo personally. I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s instantly recognizable more because of Google&#8217;s position in the market than anything else. Criminal that British Rail isn&#8217;t in there – one of the greatest logos EVER in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Bastien</title>
		<link>http://www.ocularharmony.com/20-most-iconic-influential-logos/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Bastien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocularharmony.com/?p=910#comment-136</guid>
		<description>@Douglas - I&#039;m with you on the pepsi branding, they seem to constantly be &#039;scouting&#039; for ways to get ahead of coca cola. I always hated their cheap shot commercials with celebrities saying they prefer Pepsi. Coca Cola&#039;s also the only company in the US that has the legal right to buy coca - still (and directly buy &#039;spent leaves&#039; - the leaves after people finish extracting cocaine from it). This is what gives Coke an advantage on Pepsi, RC, Tucola, etc.

@Eish:  I also really dislike the Google logo - although like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.emap.com/footprint/files/2009/10/london20121.jpg&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;infamous 2012 Olympic logo&lt;/a&gt;, it still remains iconic despite the obvious use of Photoshop filters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Douglas &#8211; I&#8217;m with you on the pepsi branding, they seem to constantly be &#8216;scouting&#8217; for ways to get ahead of coca cola. I always hated their cheap shot commercials with celebrities saying they prefer Pepsi. Coca Cola&#8217;s also the only company in the US that has the legal right to buy coca &#8211; still (and directly buy &#8216;spent leaves&#8217; &#8211; the leaves after people finish extracting cocaine from it). This is what gives Coke an advantage on Pepsi, RC, Tucola, etc.</p>
<p>@Eish:  I also really dislike the Google logo &#8211; although like the <a href="http://blog.emap.com/footprint/files/2009/10/london20121.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">infamous 2012 Olympic logo</a>, it still remains iconic despite the obvious use of Photoshop filters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eish</title>
		<link>http://www.ocularharmony.com/20-most-iconic-influential-logos/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Eish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocularharmony.com/?p=910#comment-135</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get why the Google logo is considered to be good. It goes against everything I was taught, over embossing, too many colours, drop shadow. Is it because Google is taking over the world that we overlook these things?? I think it sucks. All the other logos are iconic tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get why the Google logo is considered to be good. It goes against everything I was taught, over embossing, too many colours, drop shadow. Is it because Google is taking over the world that we overlook these things?? I think it sucks. All the other logos are iconic tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

